Battle of the Bulge
Seems the New York Times sat on the story of the mysterious bulge on Bushs back during the debates, even when it seemed that it had been conclusively shown to be an electronic prompting device prohibited by debate rules.
Read it here. While you read it, ponder what sort of “leader” seemingly can’t speak for himself, is unwilling to accept the rule of law in any circumstance (the debates, Iraq, Plame, 2000 election, 2004 election, etc…) and then attempts to cover it up when caught.
These people, to paraphrase his recent foe, are “the most crooked people I’ve ever seen…” and the NYT sat on a story they knew would impact the election- because it would impact the election. Spineless.
